As with many of the methods addressed in this series of
workshops, in the constructivist classroom, the focus tends to shift from the
teacher to the students. The classroom is no longer a place where the teacher
("expert") pours knowledge into passive students, who wait like empty
vessels to be filled. In the constructivist model, the students are urged to be
actively involved in their own process of learning. The teacher functions more
as a facilitator who coaches, mediates, prompts, and helps students develop and
assess their understanding, and thereby their learning. One of the teacher's
biggest jobs becomes ASKING GOOD QUESTIONS.
And, in the constructivist classroom, both teacher and
students think of knowledge not as inert factoids to be memorized, but as a
dynamic, ever-changing view of the world we live in and the ability to
successfully stretch and explore that view.
The chart below compares the traditional classroom to the
constructivist one. You can see significant differences in basic assumptions
about knowledge, students, and learning. (It's important, however, to bear in
mind that constructivists acknowledge that students are constructing knowledge
in traditional classrooms, too. It's really a matter of the emphasis being on
the student, not on the instructor.)
Traditional Classroom
|
Constructivist Classroom
|
Curriculum begins with the parts of the whole. Emphasizes
basic skills.
|
Curriculum emphasizes big concepts, beginning with the
whole and expanding to include the parts.
|
Strict adherence to fixed curriculum is highly valued.
|
Pursuit of student questions and interests is valued.
|
Materials are primarily textbooks and workbooks.
|
Materials include primary sources of material and
manipulative materials.
|
Learning is based on repetition.
|
Learning is interactive, building on what the student
already knows.
|
Teachers disseminate information to students; students are
recipients of knowledge.
|
Teachers have a dialogue with students, helping students
construct their own knowledge.
|
Teacher's role is directive, rooted in authority.
|
Teacher's role is interactive, rooted in negotiation.
|
Assessment is through testing, correct answers.
|
Assessment includes student works, observations, and
points of view, as well as tests. Process is as important as product.
|
Knowledge is seen as inert.
|
Knowledge is seen as dynamic, ever changing with our
experiences.
|
Students work primarily alone.
|
Students work primarily in groups.
|
What does constructivism have to do with my classroom?
As is the case with
many of the current/popular paradigms, you're probably already using the constructivist
approach to some degree. Constructivist teachers pose questions and problems,
then guide students to help them find their own answers. They use many
techniques in the teaching process. For example, they may:
- prompt students to formulate their own
questions (inquiry)
- allow multiple interpretations and
expressions of learning (multiple intelligences)
- encourage group work and the use of
peers as resources (collaborative learning)
More information on
the above processes is covered in other workshops in this series. For now, it's
important to realize that the constructivist approach borrows from many other
practices in the pursuit of its primary goal: helping students learn HOW TO
LEARN.
In a constructivist
classroom, learning is . . .
- CONSTRUCTED
Students are not blank slates upon which knowledge is etched. They come to
learning situations with already formulated knowledge, ideas, and
understandings. This previous knowledge is the raw material for the new
knowledge they will create.
Example: An elementary school teacher presents a class problem to measure the length of the "Mayflower." Rather than starting the problem by introducing the ruler, the teacher allows students to reflect and to construct their own methods of measurement. One student offers the knowledge that a doctor said he is four feet tall. Another says she knows horses are measured in "hands." The students discuss these and other methods they have heard about, and decide on one to apply to the problem.
Example: An elementary school teacher presents a class problem to measure the length of the "Mayflower." Rather than starting the problem by introducing the ruler, the teacher allows students to reflect and to construct their own methods of measurement. One student offers the knowledge that a doctor said he is four feet tall. Another says she knows horses are measured in "hands." The students discuss these and other methods they have heard about, and decide on one to apply to the problem.
- ACTIVE
Examples: A middle-school language arts teacher sets aside time each week for a writing lab. The emphasis is on content and getting ideas down rather than memorizing grammatical rules, though one of the teacher's concerns is the ability of his students to express themselves well through written language. The teacher provides opportunities for students to examine the finished and earlier drafts of various authors. He allows students to select and create projects within the general requirement of building aportfolio 1. Students serve as peer editors who value originality and uniqueness rather than the best way to fulfill an assignment.
- REFLECTIVE
Example: Students keep journals in a writing class where they record how they felt about the class projects, the visual and verbal reactions of others to the project, and how they felt their own writing had changed. Periodically the teacher reads these journals and holds a conference with the student where the two assess (1) what new knowledge the student has created, (2) how the student learns best, and (3) the learning environment and the teacher's role in it.
- COLLABORATIVE
Example: In the course of studying ancient civilizations, students undertake an archaeological dig. This may be something constructed in a large sandbox, or, as in the Dalton School's "Archaeotype" software simulation, on a computer. As the students find different objects, the teacher introduces classifying techniques. The students are encouraged to (1) set up a group museum by developing criteria and choosing which objects should belong, and (2) collaborate with other students who worked in different quadrants of the dig. Each group is then asked to develop theories about the civilizations that inhabited the area.
- INQUIRY-BASED
Example: Sixth graders figuring out how to purify water investigate solutions ranging from coffee-filter paper, to a stove-top distillation apparatus, to piles of charcoal, to an abstract mathematical solution based on the size of a water molecule. Depending upon students' responses, the teacher encourages abstract as well as concrete, poetic as well as practical, creations of new knowledge.
- EVOLVING
What happens when a student gets a new piece of information? The constructivist model says that the student compares the information to the knowledge and understanding he/she already has, and one of three things can occur:
- The new information matches up with his
previous knowledge pretty well (it'sconsonant with the previous
knowledge), so the student adds it to his understanding. It may take some
work, but it's just a matter of finding the right fit, as with a puzzle
piece.
- The information doesn't match previous
knowledge (it's dissonant). The student has to change her previous
understanding to find a fit for the information. This can be harder work.
- The information doesn't match previous
knowledge, and it is ignored. Rejected bits of information may just
not be absorbed by the student. Or they may float around, waiting for the
day when the student's understanding has developed and permits a fit.
Example: An
elementary teacher believes her students are ready to study gravity. She
creates an environment of discovery with objects of varying kinds. Students
explore the differences in weight among similarly sized blocks of Styrofoam,
wood, and lead. Some students hold the notion that heavier objects fall faster
than light ones. The teacher provides materials (stories, posters, and videos)
about Galileo, Newton, etc. She leads a discussion on theories about falling.
The students then replicate Galileo's experiment by dropping objects of
different weights and measuring how fast they fall. They see that objects of
different weights actually usually fall at the same speed, although surface
area and aerodynamic properties can affect the rate of fall.
No comments:
Post a Comment